Android Vs Pure Linux Mobile OS
Gaurav Technology No Comments »Google has made a derivative of linux and made a another mobile os , but how its different from say other linux based mobile distro like nokia mameo …..difference is
- Google implemented own Windowing system rather using existing X windows system on linux , which means standard linux apps wont run on it
- Google made a their own language called Dalvik with syntax like j2me rather than extending j2me , which means standard j2me app cannot run on it without modification
this rather unfortunate as Android wont be able to leverage hundreds of thousands of exiting linux apps and j2me apps , fragmented linux , same it story with chrome os. I really dont know why google has wasted so much time (and others too like Motorola specially) on this toy rather than using existing toolset and they have successfully managed to further fragmented entire mobile market with yet another mobile OS and language. I guess they just made this project to get control and confuse market (more control == embedding google services and application directly into mobile , which means more clicks nd eyeball for advt)
I think nokia maemo is better solution , its based on debian core (oldest and most stable linux distro ) and match box window manager , which all Linux apps will work on it , in this age of powerful mobile cpu (already 1 gz in snapdragon ) and ram it does matter !!
Here is what my take on Android and chome os
- ITS TOY , Can’t run standard linux apps and chrome os just a glorified web browser
- JUNK IT , specially guys like motorola use a real OS like maemo , make your own linux derivative
- All those hw vendor stop wasting your time on andriod , use maemo and drivers from andriod
- NOKIA pl be serious about maemo , stop wasting your r&d $ on old rag like symbian , use on creating great UI and user experience and replace maemo on all top and mid range phone , you guys just dont have time waste other wise apple and RIM will bite your ass






Recent Comments